diff --git a/content/blog/angular-dynamic-host-usage/index.md b/content/blog/angular-dynamic-host-usage/index.md
index 55a97031..8d390282 100644
--- a/content/blog/angular-dynamic-host-usage/index.md
+++ b/content/blog/angular-dynamic-host-usage/index.md
@@ -231,10 +231,68 @@ export class App {}
# Dynamic component `host` property binding
-But what if I told you that these properties were not unique to a directive?
+But what if I told you that these `host` properties were not unique to a directive? See, when I asked you at the start of the article to think of directives like components without templates I wasn't joking: **Angular components are directives with an additional template that is rendered as the `selector`'s children**.
+```typescript
+@Component({
+ selector: 'do-nothing',
+ standalone: true,
+ // Nothing in the template means nothing rendered as the `do-nothing` element
+ template: '',
+})
+class DoNothingComponent {}
+
+@Component({
+ selector: 'app-root',
+ standalone: true,
+ imports: [DoNothingComponent],
+ template: `
+
+
+
+
+`,
+})
+export class App {}
```
+This code sample will render:
+
+````html
+
+
+
+````
+
+Because we added an empty template. This `do-nothing` element isn't special, either; the browser is built to allow non-registered elements and treat them akin to a `div` when they render.
+
+Don't believe me? Try to render the above markup in HTML:
+
+```html
+
```
-As it turns out, **components in Angular are built using the same core APIs as directives**
\ No newline at end of file
+This will render the same markup as typed; no removal of `` will occur and the `` element will act as if it were inside of two `div`s.
+
+That's all that's _really_ happening when we add a template to our existing `` element:
+
+```typescript
+@Component({
+ selector: 'do-nothing',
+ standalone: true,
+ template: 'Hello, world!
',
+})
+class DoNothingComponent {}
+```
+
+While there _is_ a template compiler in Angular, it's only really there for [reactivity](/posts/what-is-reactivity). Otherwise, it injects the results of `template` in the `selector`'s (by default empty) children array.
+
+This is why when people ask me:
+
+> How to remove the host element created by an Angular component's `selector`?
+
+The answer is: **it is not possible to remove the host element**. The host element is not being created by the `selector`, but rather is injecting the component's template as the children of a non-standard HTML element; who's default behavior is to be a blank slate.