With the release of Turborepo 2 we're renaming `pipeline` to `tasks`.
This PR updates the default settings logic to look in `tasks` for a
`build` task definition in addition to looking at `pipeline`. It also
updates the message to no longer mention Turbo configuration in
`package.json` as this is fully ignored in Turborepo 2.
Added a quick unit test to verify `build` task definitions are found in
the `tasks` section of `turbo.json`.
Please let me know if there are other tests/places I should update.
Updates package manager detection to account for two lock files. All other managers will only have the one lock file. Bun, however, may have both a `bun.lockb` _and_ a `yarn.lock` file. To ensure bun is properly detected, the presence of `bun.lockb` with `yarn.lock` must occur before `yarn.lock` so we don't mistake the presence of a `yarn.lock` to mean "Yarn".
This PR also adds a test for this situation in `fs-detectors`. The behavior is currently correct there, but was not tested initially. It is now to avoid future regressions.
`LocalFileSystemDetector#readdir()` was throwing an error when a symlink was encountered, due to `fs.readdir()` `withFileTypes: true` option performing an lstat instead of a stat operation.
So re-implement the `readdir()` logic to use `fs.stat()` so that the symlink is resolved (only "dir" and "file" types are expected in the result).
If there is a monorepo that has one project at the root level we want to
return commands without the relative to root prefixes
---------
Co-authored-by: Chris Barber <chris.barber@vercel.com>
1. `commandForIgnoringBuildStep` should be run at the project directory level not the monorepo root level
2. Simplifying the `installCommand` because doesn't need the relative root unless it is `npm`
### Related Issues
Improves how `vc build` handles monorepos. In short, this introduces
monorepo manager detection logic and then some helpful defaults so users
don't have to manually specify a `buildCommand` or `installCommand` when
linking a project within a monorepo.
### 📋 Checklist
<!--
Please keep your PR as a Draft until the checklist is complete
-->
#### Tests
- [ ] The code changed/added as part of this PR has been covered with
tests
- [ ] All tests pass locally with `yarn test-unit`
#### Code Review
- [ ] This PR has a concise title and thorough description useful to a
reviewer
- [ ] Issue from task tracker has a link to this PR
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
### Related Issues
Parse `rush.json` files with `json5` because it is very common for these
to have comments in them
[Template for people to clone for
Rush](https://rushjs.io/pages/configs/rush_json/) which has comments in
it as a default which most people will clone
Docs of Rush showing to not use `JSON.parse`
https://rushjs.io/pages/help/faq/#why-do-rushs-json-config-files-contain--comments-that-github-shows-in-red
Added in tests with block comments and single line comments
### 📋 Checklist
<!--
Please keep your PR as a Draft until the checklist is complete
-->
#### Tests
- [ ] The code changed/added as part of this PR has been covered with
tests
- [ ] All tests pass locally with `yarn test-unit`
#### Code Review
- [ ] This PR has a concise title and thorough description useful to a
reviewer
- [ ] Issue from task tracker has a link to this PR
Co-authored-by: Sean Massa <EndangeredMassa@gmail.com>
### Related Issues
Add in getting the package paths for Rush workspaces.
First get the contents of the `rush.json` file. If the `projects`
property is an array, map through that array and return the
`projectFolder` as the package path.
### 📋 Checklist
<!--
Please keep your PR as a Draft until the checklist is complete
-->
#### Tests
- [ ] The code changed/added as part of this PR has been covered with
tests
- [ ] All tests pass locally with `yarn test-unit`
#### Code Review
- [ ] This PR has a concise title and thorough description useful to a
reviewer
- [ ] Issue from task tracker has a link to this PR
### Related Issues
Add in Rush workspace
### 📋 Checklist
<!--
Please keep your PR as a Draft until the checklist is complete
-->
#### Tests
- [ ] The code changed/added as part of this PR has been covered with
tests
- [ ] All tests pass locally with `yarn test-unit`
#### Code Review
- [ ] This PR has a concise title and thorough description useful to a
reviewer
- [ ] Issue from task tracker has a link to this PR
### Related Issues
https://nx.dev/more-concepts/folder-structure#integrated-repo-folder-structure
Nx monorepo has an option to use Nx workspaces.
Nx workspace is defined within the root `workspace.json` file
Within this `workspace.json` file the workspace packages are under
projects
```{
"$schema": "./node_modules/nx/schemas/workspace-schema.json",
"version": 2,
"projects": {
"myblog": "apps/myblog",
"svelte-app": "apps/svelte-app",
}
}
```
Within `getNxWorkspacePackagePaths` get the projects object values for
the paths
Nx is listed as the last workspace manager within
`workspace-managers.ts` because other workspace managers could exist to
check for before Nx workspaces because the `workspace.json` could exist
but not be the correct workspace manager
Nx workspace file can exist when yarn/npm workspaces exist. When this
happens, the workspace.json file is empty with no projects so it will
not add any package paths to the list to look through for projects.
### 📋 Checklist
<!--
Please keep your PR as a Draft until the checklist is complete
-->
#### Tests
- [ ] The code changed/added as part of this PR has been covered with
tests
- [ ] All tests pass locally with `yarn test-unit`
#### Code Review
- [ ] This PR has a concise title and thorough description useful to a
reviewer
- [ ] Issue from task tracker has a link to this PR
### Related Issues
Adding in Nx and Rush as monorepo managers.
This will allow to help with starting zero config for both the above managers.
I have added in unit tests for both Nx and Rush.
### 📋 Checklist
#### Tests
- [ ] The code changed/added as part of this PR has been covered with tests
- [ ] All tests pass locally with `yarn test-unit`
#### Code Review
- [ ] This PR has a concise title and thorough description useful to a reviewer
- [ ] Issue from task tracker has a link to this PR
The `@vercel/build-utils` package was meant be shared functions necessary for writing a Vercel Builder (aka Runtime).
This package has since bloated into the catch-all package for anything that wasn't a Builder.
This PR removes the bloat in favor of a new package, `@vercel/fs-detectors`. It also removes the need for `@vercel/build-utils` to have a dependency on `@vercel/frameworks`.
- Related to #7951
