From 674a25a3d221a62d4fc1a0e77d9151820b16f73b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Veeresh <75656445+Veera-mulge@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 11:14:47 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] Update +page.markdoc

---
 .../blog/post/open-source-vercel-alternative/+page.markdoc      | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/routes/blog/post/open-source-vercel-alternative/+page.markdoc b/src/routes/blog/post/open-source-vercel-alternative/+page.markdoc
index b2946d44d..a64fd5449 100644
--- a/src/routes/blog/post/open-source-vercel-alternative/+page.markdoc
+++ b/src/routes/blog/post/open-source-vercel-alternative/+page.markdoc
@@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ Most static and SPA setups work seamlessly. The only exception is SSR support fo
 
 If you're using a framework outside of Next.js, Appwrite Sites provides a more consistent experience across the board. This is also an advantage for teams that use different frameworks for different parts of their stack.
 
+{% call_to_action title="All-in-one development platform" description="Use built-in backend infrastructure and web hosting, all from a single place." point1="Start for free"  point2="Open source" point3="Support for over 13 SDKs" point4="Managed cloud solution" cta="Start building for free" url="https://cloud.appwrite.io/console/register?type=create&plan=tier-1" /%}
+
 # Hosting options: Static vs SSR
 
 Appwrite Sites supports both **Static/SPA** hosting and **Server-Side Rendering (SSR)**, much like Vercel. But there are a few differences in how they operate.